When a U.S. President allegedly murders his rape victim

When a U.S. President murders his “sex slave”

If you’re following the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case – you’re upset. We all are. We’re appalled. We want justice. None of us believe justice cannot be had. However, what if I told you this happened before and not even mainsteam media, who are always hungry for clickbait, wrote about one woman who claimed a U.S. President raped her? Not then and not after her death. I am sure they know her name. But, they’re not going to tell you. So, let me introduce you. Her name was Margie Schoedinger. His name is George W. Bush. Both were Texas natives. In Margie’s lawsuit she alleged to have “dated” Bush when she was a minor. She also claimed she was raped and drugged by “FBI men” on his orders as an adult. On September 22, 2003, at the age of 37, Margie died of a gunshot wound to the head. The 5’8 African-American woman was a svelte 125 lbs (which barely fluctuated throughout her adult life). Those who knew her said she retained the regal beauty of her youth. Her death was ruled a suicide by the coroner’s office. It was less than one year after she filed a lawsuit against the sitting U.S. President, George W. Bush, citing “various sex crimes against her and her husband”. Only one newspaper in Texas published a story about Margie’s alleged ties to Bush. There were a couple of bloggers who wrote about it, but most of these have been scrubbed off the internet. At some point, the one media outlet that printed the story about Margie’s lawsuit issued a retraction. It’s clear someone doesn’t want this story told. Ever.

President George W. Bush

George is the eldest son of George H.W. Bush who was sworn in as Director of the Central Intelligence Agency in 1976 before becoming the 46th Vice President (under Ronald Reagan) from 1981 to 1989. He then became the 41st President of the United States of America in 1989 through 1993.

It is worth noting that Leslie Wexner, who set up Jeffrey Epstein in various homes - including the largest private mansion in all of New York City which he gave to Epstein for the princely sum of $1 (and which already included surveillance cameras as per a 1996 article in The New York Times) was a major political contributor to the Bush family. As recently as 2015 Wexner cut a check in the amount of $500,000.00 to Jeb Bush who was a candidate in the 2016 U.S. Presidential election. Wexner’s wife, Abigail, made similar contributions to the Bush family.

Margie Schoedinger’s story is similar to other CIA “mind-controlled sex slaves”.

Before working on the Epstein case I would have been skeptical of this shocking allegation – even though, I too, was a “mind-controlled sex slave”. My memoir ‘The Billionaire’s Woman’ is here. Margie’s case, however, is no longer an isolated one. We have Jeffrey Epstein & Ghislaine Maxwell’s victims as concrete proof. Many of the survivors we have heard from allege they were “gifted” as sexual toys to Presidents, Princes and other powerful politicians throughout the world. Note: Some of the legal cases brought against Jeffrey Epstein that included names of U.S. Presidents were settled out of court by Epstein before his death. There is also the matter of Katie Johnson who alleged in a lawsuit dated April 26, 2016 against Jeffrey Epstein and President Donald Trump that they viciously and repeatedly raped her when she was just 13. Her lawsuit was abruptly dropped when she claimed to have received threats to her life.

There’s also Brice Taylor and Cathy O’Brien

Other similar accounts that come to mind: Brice Taylor and Cathy O’Brien among them. Both women wrote books about their experience as “sex slaves” in the CIA’s controversial ‘Project Monarch’. Taylor wrote ‘Thanks for the Memories’ and O’Brien’s bestseller is ‘TRANS-formation’.

The lawsuit against George W. Bush

I wanted you to get the same visceral reaction I felt when I was able to dig up the long-lost lawsuit Margie Schoedinger filed on December 2, 2002 against George W. Bush – who was a sitting President when this happened. To that end it’s reprinted below. In the event you want to see the original, it can be found here.

MARGIE SCHOEDINGER, IN THE COUNTY CIVIL COURT Plaintiff AT LAW NUMBER 3 vs. GEORGE W. BUSH, FORT BEND COUNTY, TEXAS Defendant PLAINTIFF'S ORIGINAL PETITION TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: COMES NOW, MARGIE SCHOEDINGER, Plaintiff, in the above styled and numbered cause, submitting Plaintiff's Original Petition, and shows the court the following: I. Plaintiff is a resident of Fort Bend County, Texas, residing at10422 Village Lake Drive, Missouri City, Texas 77459. Defendant is George W. Bush, Former Governor of Texas and current President of the United States and can be served with process at: Office of the President of the United States, Executive Office Building, The Executive Office of the President, Washington D. C. 20501. II. On or about, October 26, 2000, an attempt was made to abduct Plaintiff by three unknown assailants. Because of the actions of these assailants, Sugar Land police officers were dispatched to the scene. In the end, no report was taken, the assailants were treated respectfully and allowed to go free while Plaintiff was repeatedly and aggressively questioned. After filing a lawsuit, Plaintiff's family and past contacts were questioned and harassed. As a result, Plaintiff dismissed Plaintiff's lawsuit. Irrespective of Plaintiff dismissing the lawsuit, the harassment continued. At some point, Plaintiff contacted the Houston office of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, filing a raced based harassment complaint, advising that the Sugar Land Police Department may or may not be harassing Plaintiff on behalf of her neighbors in Sugar Land or possibly on behalf of the First Colony Community Services Association. The agent in question advised Plaintiff that the situation appeared to be highly organized and most likely higher level, such as a racist organization. III. Eventually the harassment increased to the point where Plaintiff took the step of writing letters directly to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Houston Office. Instead of assisting Plaintiff with her concerns, the FBI took on the same demeanor as the Sugar Land Police Department. Eventually, Plaintiff learned, via telephone conversations, that both the Sugar Land Police Department and the Houston Office of the Federal Bureau of Investigations were acting at the behest of the Defendant, George W. Bush. As a part of their defense, the Sugar Land Police Department conducted a background investigation into Plaintiff's past activities. In the end, this investigation yielded the following information: Plaintiff had seven dates, (which became seven lovers), had told no lies, committed no crimes, gotten 2 traffic tickets and dated George W. Bush as a minor. IV. Instead of looking at this information and keeping this information concealed, both agencies began revealing this information within their own intranets. In an effort to defend himself, the Defendant and his representatives began contacting Plaintiff regarding the relationship. While Plaintiff assured the Defendant and his representatives that she neither personally revealed this information, nor would she confirm it in any setting, the Defendant, his family and his representatives continued to threaten Plaintiff. V. In the end, Plaintiff learned that while the Defendant and his representatives requested that she be harassed at all costs by both agencies, the Defendant also informed Plaintiff that his only option to assure his never having to answer for the previous contact would be to simply see Plaintiff pressured to the point of committing suicide. Plaintiff s opinion was that Defendant should simply leave Plaintiff to pursue a second attempt at a degree, even a PhD. Additionally, even if the previous contact were revealed in the future, it would be of no consequence. In response to Plaintiff s refusal to give in, Plaintiff s bank account has been expunged, Plaintiff s husband has been dismissed from his place of employment, and Plaintiff has been raped and beaten -which resulted in a miscarriage. Upon going to the hospital, Plaintiff was threatened by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation on behalf of the Defendant. The purpose being to keep Plaintiff from remaining in the hospital and be administered thorough treatment. The reason being that the Defendant might have been the father of the child that was lost. VI. Now Plaintiff continues to be threatened. According to the office of the Defendant and the Defendant, Plaintiff’s background has been ruined, Plaintiff will never be able to have a clean credit bureau, Plaintiff's husband will never be able to find a job, Plaintiff degrees will continue to be expunged as well as any other achievement on Plaintiff's parts, Plaintiff will be placed on an AIDs watch list for the rest of her life, watched by the CIA, harassed by the Secret Service, placed on the National Security Agency's Photo Array, (which would cause Plaintiff to be considered as a suspect in any crime where the suspect remotely fits Plaintiff’s description), Plaintiff’s home is under surveillance in a manner that is fully recordable in all aspects and this surveillance is able to be loaded onto an internet page within minutes; including but not limited to prison Web sites, military web sites and any internet locale that might cause Plaintiff to be killed, raped, beaten or put in harm’s way. Moreover, the Defendant took personal responsibility for these decisions, explaining to Plaintiff that committing suicide would be her best option as in his opinion; Plaintiff is essentially dead in any case. No matter what Plaintiff's background was before, no matter how pristine, Plaintiff would be destroyed completely. At this point, the question repeatedly became whether or not the Defendant could have fathered the child and whether or not the hospital had actually collected the pathology on the unborn child. Finally, we decided that Plaintiff should be killed rather than being harassed to the point of committing suicide. However, the defendant stated he could not convince anyone he could trust to keep the secret to do this for him. The decision then became that the defendant should kill the Plaintiff personally. Instead of following through and just killing Plaintiff, defendant decided to go forth and ruin Plaintiff's life instead. This is the cause of Plaintiff filing this lawsuit. VII. Throughout this conversation, Plaintiff learned that there was no time that the Defendant ever stopped watching Plaintiff, nor did he stop having sex with Plaintiff. The sole concern of the Defendant and his representatives was whether Plaintiff could actually recall the individual sex crimes committed against Plaintiff and Plaintiff's husband, utilizing drugs. Whether or not Plaintiff's husband was raped remains in question, as Plaintiff was drugged after she was raped and her husband was drugged before her rape. Plaintiff can only state that these men purported to be FBI agents raping her for the purpose of covering for how many times they had drugged her and allowed the Defendant to rape her in the same manner. VIII. Plaintiff repeats and re-alleges allegation in Paragraphs I through VII. Plaintiff has sustained 1 million dollars in actual damages and seeks punitive damages in the amount of 49 million dollars for reasons of emotional distress, loss of freedom and ability to pursue Plaintiff's own dreams, alienation of affection from Plaintiff's spouse, loss of privacy, being disparaged on the internet, and loss of Plaintiff ability to be a Christian writer. Plaintiff has suffered all of the aforementioned and more as a result of Defendant's actions as described herein. Plaintiff prays that in addition to the aforementioned recovery, Plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs in preparing this action for trial, pursuing any necessary appeal of this action and retaining an attorney to pursue said action. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays that the Defendant, be sited to appear and answer, and that on final trial, Plaintiff be granted the following: 1. Judgment against defendant for actual damage suffered by the Plaintiff. 2. Judgment against the defendant for punitive damage. 3. A further judgment against the defendant in excess of the minimum jurisdictional limits of the court. 4. Costs of Suit. 5. Pre-Judgment Interest. 6. Post-Judgment Interest. 7. Such other and further relief to which Plaintiff may be justly entitled. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Dated this 2nd day of December, 2002 Margie D. Schoedinger

About the Epstein Project I began the ‘Epstein Project’ newsletter almost immediately after the arrest of Jeffrey Epstein in July of 2019. It became a vehicle through which I could share information on a platform that wasn’t censored. Read more. This newsletter is provided to you by the generosity of my paid subscribers. I hope you, too, will consider supporting my work by purchasing a subscription.

Epstein Project, the Book

Essays by Kirby Sommers

Please remember to Like & Share!